damages in lieu of reinstatementarbitrator's failure to consider submissionsremittal for rehearing
Tags
arbitrationquantification of damagesreinstatement
legislation
Statutes Cited
T
o
w
n
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
c
t
1
9
9
0
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
7
2
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator err by awarding damages despite alleged repudiation of contract by respondent?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent sought quantification; appellant alleged repudiation"}
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator fail to consider the appellant's submissions?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award analysis section silent on appellant's submissions"}
{"issue_text":"Should the award be set aside and the matter remitted for rehearing?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator gave no reasons on appellant's submissions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent employee was awarded reinstatement by an arbitrator; she later sought quantification in lieu of reinstatement. The arbitrator quantified damages at $4,455-00. The appellant employer appealed, arguing the arbitrator ignored its submissions and misdirected herself on the law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases