Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Aaron Majero v Dubekile Danda

HH 119-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 March 2018
Citation
HH 119-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 119
Judgment No.
Civil Appeal No. CIV ‘A’ 311/08
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Hlatshwayo J
Full Bench
Hlatshwayo JMavangira J
Areas of Law
Contract lawProperty law
Keywords
Cancellation of contractWaiverEstoppelElectionLate paymentVacant possession
Tags
Contract of saleCancellationEvictionLate payment
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Immigration Act 1971
  • Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
  • Refugee Convention 1951
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2000 (SI 2000/1161)
  • Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2003 (SI 2003/531)
  • Immigration (Restrictions on Employment) Order 2003 (SI 2003/3369)
  • Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/2326)
  • Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003)
  • Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Act 2004
  • Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006
  • Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009
  • Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
  • Immigration Act 2014
  • Immigration Act 2016
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether appellant lost right to cancel contract by accepting late payments","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Continuous acceptance of late and irregular payments over one year"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Appellant sold property to respondent for Z$50 million. Respondent paid deposit but failed to pay balance by August 2004 deadline, instead making irregular payments over following year. Appellant accepted all payments then sought to cancel contract and evict respondent. Magistrate refused cancellation. Appeal dismissed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →