Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Abdul Ahmad v Conju-Incorporated (Pvt) Ltd & 2 Ors

HH 71-2007

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
10 October 2007
Citation
HH 71-2007
Neutral Citation
[2007] ZWHH 71
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Hungwe J
Full Bench
Hungwe J
Areas of Law
Commercial LawLaw of Agency
Keywords
ostensible authoritycar sales agentmotor vehiclesale without authority
Tags
motor vehicle saleagency authorityostensible authority
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • d
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • m
  • a
  • t
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • a
  • g
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • y
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • ;
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Did the car sales agents have ostensible authority to conclude the sale agreement on behalf of the applicant?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant gave stated price; agents sold at that price without further reference"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Applicant entrusted his Toyota Cressida to a car dealership for sale; the dealer sold it to the third respondent without the applicant’s express approval. Applicant sought return of the vehicle, claiming the sale was unauthorised.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →