Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

AC Controls (Private) Limited v Sable Chemical Industries Limited

[2020] ZWSC 18

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
11 February 2020
Citation
[2020] ZWSC 18
Judgment No.
SC 18/20
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
GOWORA JA
Full Bench
GARWE JAGOWORA JAGUVAVA JA
Areas of Law
Contract lawCommercial law
Keywords
Contract formationOffer and acceptanceCounter-offerMeeting of minds
Tags
Contract lawConsensus ad idemCounter-offerPurchase order
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Immigration Act 1971
  • Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 1987
  • Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • Immigration Rules (HC 395)
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
  • Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993
  • Asylum and Immigration Act 1996
  • Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006
  • UK Borders Act 2007
  • Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009
  • Immigration Act 2014
  • Immigration Act 2016
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a valid agreement came into place between the parties","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Exchange of quotation, purchase order, cancellation email"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the agreement was cancelled by the defendant","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Email placing order on hold, timing of cancellation"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether delivery by the plaintiff was done in terms of the cancelled order","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Delivery after cancellation, refusal of acceptance"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the defendant was liable to pay USD 236,520.45","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Delivery of goods, refusal to pay, claim for damages"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant claimed payment for circuit breakers delivered to the respondent, alleging a valid contract existed. The respondent denied liability, claiming it had cancelled the order before acceptance. The High Court found no valid contract existed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →