Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Actglow Investments (Private) Limited v Provincial Mining Director, Mashonaland Central and The Secretary, Mines and Mining Development

HH 385-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
22 July 2021
Citation
HH 385-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 385
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
ZHOU J
Full Bench
ZHOU J
Areas of Law
Administrative LawMining LawContempt of Court
Keywords
Special GrantProspectingMining OperationsContempt of CourtInjunction
Tags
Mining LawContempt of CourtSpecial GrantProspecting Rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • e
  • x
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • i
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • f
  • r
  • a
  • m
  • e
  • w
  • o
  • r
  • k
  • b
  • u
  • t
  • d
  • o
  • e
  • s
  • n
  • o
  • t
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • a
  • n
  • y
  • s
  • p
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • f
  • i
  • c
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the respondents should be held in contempt of court for non-compliance with the order in HC 1138/19","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged continued issuance of mining licenses; applicant's illegal mining operations"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to have the respondents held in contempt of court for allegedly failing to comply with an order granted in HC 1138/19. The previous order had set aside decisions barring the applicant from prospecting and required respondents to issue an injunction against illegal operations. The applicant alleged the respondents continued issuing mining licenses to persons disrupting its operations.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →