{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator Dangarembizi erred in finding respondent guilty of wilful disobedience to lawful order","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Instruction of 19 April 2012, June 2012 loan authorisations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator Dangarembizi erred in interfering with penalty of dismissal","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Wilful disobedience found to be serious misconduct"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator Mudzengi erred in appointing dismissed employee to position","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent was dismissed when order made"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employee dismissed for misconduct including wilful disobedience to lawful order and unauthorised loans. Arbitrator found him guilty of wilful disobedience but altered dismissal to warning. Separate arbitrator appointed him to acting position while dismissed. Employer appealed both awards.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases