rescission of judgmentapplication for leave to appealdefault judgment
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
P
o
w
e
r
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
C
o
u
r
t
s
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
M
u
r
d
e
r
(
A
b
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
a
t
h
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
)
A
c
t
1
9
6
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
1
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
S
c
o
t
l
a
n
d
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
3
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
2
0
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the refusal to rescind default judgment","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant failed to attend court; court found reason unreasonable"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant failed to attend court and sought rescission of the resulting default judgment. The court dismissed the rescission application on 22 March 2013, finding the reason given for non-attendance unreasonable. The applicant then sought leave to appeal this refusal to the Supreme Court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases