Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

African Sun Limited v Tersh Mahiya

[2016] ZWLC 204

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
8 April 2016
Citation
[2016] ZWLC 204
Judgment No.
LC/H/204/16
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Mhuri J
Full Bench
Mhuri J
Areas of Law
Employment LawLabour Arbitration
Keywords
resignationterminal benefitscommissionsleave daysarbitrator jurisdictionunfair labour practice
Tags
resignationterminal benefitscommissionsleave payarbitrator jurisdiction
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does a labour arbitrator have jurisdiction to hear claims by an employee who has resigned?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent resigned on 30 April 2013"}
  • {"issue_text":"Is cash in lieu of leave payable to a resigned employee under Section 13 of the Labour Act?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent had 21 days accrued leave"}
  • {"issue_text":"Are commissions earned during employment payable after resignation?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent claimed 2011 and COPAC commissions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent resigned from employment as Sales Manager without giving required notice. She claimed terminal benefits including cash in lieu of leave and outstanding commissions. The appellant disputed the arbitrator's jurisdiction over claims by a resigned employee.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →