{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator failed to uphold the principle of legitimate expectation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Fixed-term contracts regularly renewed; contracts lapsed without renewal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator failed to adopt, observe or get influenced by clear judicial precedence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants relied on similar judgments ruling employees became permanent by passage of time"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by ignoring alleged discrimination against appellants","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allegation that similar employees had contracts renewed"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Five employees who had been employed on fixed-term contracts between 1999 and 2005 had their contracts lapse between July and September 2010 without renewal. They claimed unlawful dismissal based on legitimate expectation of renewal, but an arbitrator dismissed their claims on 23 February 2011.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases