Breach of contractSpecific performanceDamagesCorporate veilForeign currency allocationVehicle supply contract
Tags
Contract lawBreach of contractCorporate veilDamagesSpecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules, 1971
High Court Rules, 1971
High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the contract was conditional upon the first defendant obtaining foreign currency from Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract silent on foreign currency; defendants claimed import necessity; letters after contract mentioning foreign currency"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the corporate veil should be lifted to make second and third defendants personally liable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second defendant admitted being alter ego; funds diverted for personal use; company has no assets"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff is entitled to specific performance or damages","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Vehicles no longer in production; defendants failed to deliver"}
{"issue_text":"Whether amendment to change currency of claim should be allowed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application made at trial commencement; defendants opposed"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff bank contracted with the first defendant company for supply of 45 Ford Ranger vehicles. The plaintiff paid the full purchase price of Z$1.687 billion, but the defendants failed to deliver any vehicles. The defendants claimed they needed foreign currency allocation from Reserve Bank to import the vehicles, though the contract was silent on this requirement. The second and third defendants, as sole directors and shareholders, diverted the purchase price for personal use.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases