Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Agson Mafuta Chioza v The Minister of Lands, Agriculture, Water and Rural Resettlement and Josiah Chikowore

HH 569-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
29 August 2022
Citation
HH 569-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 569
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mangota J
Full Bench
Mangota J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
farm exchangeland acquisitiondeed of grantgame parkstate land
Tags
land reformfarm acquisitionspecific performancerei vindicatio
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 1
  • N
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • y
  • ,
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • A
  • s
  • y
  • l
  • u
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2
  • T
  • r
  • i
  • b
  • u
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • s
  • ,
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • E
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
  • L
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • ,
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • h
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • D
  • a
  • t
  • a
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • F
  • r
  • e
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • m
  • o
  • f
  • I
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • E
  • q
  • u
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • y
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 0
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a binding farm-for-farm exchange agreement existed between applicant and Minister","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's claim of oral agreement, no written agreement produced, committee recommendations"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has locus standi to claim eviction of settlers","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Disputed ownership of farm, prior sale to Sawyer, Supreme Court decision"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether claim is lis pendens due to prior litigation","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"HC 4188/13 pending"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant claimed ownership of Rothbury Farm and sought an order compelling the Minister to transfer a game park to him in exchange for the farm, which he alleged had been erroneously settled with new farmers including the second respondent. The Minister and second respondent opposed, asserting the farm was lawfully acquired state land.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →