{"issue_text":"Whether the exclusion of the second respondent from promotion constituted unlawful discrimination under section 5(1)(e) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second respondent excluded while eight colleagues promoted; second respondent had pending disciplinary case"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the designated agent's order for promotion should be confirmed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sought confirmation of designated agent's ruling"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The second respondent, a parking supervisor Grade 11 employed by City of Harare since 1995, alleged discrimination when he was excluded from promotions to parking sergeant Grade 10 while eight colleagues acting in similar positions were promoted. The promotions followed an arbitral award, but the second respondent was excluded due to a pending disciplinary case for gross misconduct, though he was later cleared on appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases