Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Alexios Chigaazira v Shake Museve and Laura Mukwekwe and Raphael Gabriel

HH 229-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
6 April 2017
Citation
HH 229-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 229
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Dube J
Full Bench
Dube J
Areas of Law
Property LawLandlord and Tenant Law
Keywords
vindicationlienhypothecstorageequipmentleasesublease
Tags
rei vindicatiolandlord's lientacit hypothecbiscuit making equipment
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • s
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • ;
  • n
  • o
  • Z
  • i
  • m
  • b
  • a
  • b
  • w
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • o
  • r
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • e
  • i
  • g
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • i
  • s
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant is entitled to vindicate his equipment from respondents","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant owns equipment, equipment in respondents' possession"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondents have valid landlord's lien over third party property","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Equipment belongs to applicant but stored by third respondent"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought return of his biscuit making equipment stored with the second respondent. The respondents refused to release the equipment claiming a landlord's lien for unpaid storage rentals. The equipment had been brought for storage by the third respondent when the applicant's biscuit making business was temporarily suspended.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →