unfair transferreinstatementarbitration awardcode of conductaudi alteram partem
Tags
transfer disputesunfair labour practicesdisciplinary proceedings
legislation
Statutes Cited
Not specified in judgment
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in failing to recognize appellant acted in terms of registered Code of Conduct","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Allied Timbers Conditions of Service Manual section 5"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator exceeded terms of reference by ordering reinstatement","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Terms limited to unfair transfer and remedy"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant observed audi alteram partem rule","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Works Council Meetings, union representation"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator properly considered evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Accommodation claims, failure to report"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondents entitled to transfer package","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Policy on temporary vs permanent transfers"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant company transferred respondents to different workstations due to low productivity. After initial transfer was reversed following union complaint, second transfers were made to urban centres. Respondents refused to comply, were dismissed after disciplinary hearings, and successfully claimed unfair transfer at arbitration. The company appeals the arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases