{"issue_text":"Whether the declaration filed after the failed appeal was a nullity for being out of time","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Declaration filed on 2020-06-12 after appeal struck off roll"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the special plea was properly before the court having not been set down in terms of r138","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Special plea filed 2020-10-02, not set down within 14 days"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiffs sought a declaratur that the purported issue and allotment of shares to the first defendant and another was null and void. After the court referred the matter to trial, the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court instead of filing their declaration as ordered. The Supreme Court struck the appeal off the roll, and the plaintiffs subsequently filed their declaration. The first defendant raised a special plea claiming the declaration was a nullity for being filed out of time without condonation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases