Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Amari Platinum Mauritius Limited and Amari Nickel Holdings Zimbabwe Limited and Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation v Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation and The Chief Mining Commissioner, Ministry of Mines and Mining Development and Zimari Platinum (Private) Limited and Zimari Nickel (Private) Limited

HH 26-11

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
24 January 2011
Citation
HH 26-11
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 26
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
BHUNU J
Full Bench
BHUNU J
Areas of Law
Commercial LawMining LawArbitration Law
Keywords
mining rightsmemoranda of understandinginterim interdictarbitrationstatus quo
Tags
MiningInterdictArbitrationMemorandum of Understanding
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 0
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether to grant interim interdict pending arbitration proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Urgent application filed; opposing papers filed morning of hearing; arbitration to be instituted in Paris"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants sought an urgent interim interdict to prevent the first respondent from alienating or dealing with mining rights and shareholding in companies arising from memoranda of understanding concluded in 2006 and 2008. The application was opposed by the first respondent who filed opposing papers on the morning of the hearing.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →