{"issue_text":"Whether the appeals committee erred by not requiring Mr Tavarwisa to give viva voce evidence for cross-examination","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mr Tavarwisa provided only an affidavit; applicant claimed inability to cross-examine"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a creditors clerk employed by T.M. Supermarket, was dismissed for allegedly receiving a US$450 bribe from a service provider. After exhausting internal appeals, he applied for review of the dismissal decision, arguing that the appeals committee failed to consider that he could not cross-examine a key witness who provided only an affidavit.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases