Andrew John Pascoe v Ministry of Lands & Rural Resettlement and W. Bungu and The Attorney General N.O

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the urgent chamber application was properly constituted given the time available","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Service on May 12, 2017, application filed June 1, 2017, deadline June 30, 2017"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether urgent chamber application was the correct procedure vs urgent court application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Court rules provide for urgent court applications with shortened timeframes"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether applicant established requirements for interim interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Fear of imminent harm, irreparable harm, no alternative remedy"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the eviction notice violated constitutional and administrative justice provisions","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Sections 68 and 69 of Constitution, Administrative Justice Act"}

Background