Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Antonio & Dzvetero Legal Practitioners, Tendero Dzvetero, Tapson S T Dzvetero v The Executive Secretary of the Law Society, The Law Society of Zimbabwe Council, The Law Society of Zimbabwe

HH 525-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
23 September 2021
Citation
HH 525-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 525
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Chinamora J
Full Bench
Chinamora J
Areas of Law
Administrative lawLegal practitioner regulation
Keywords
Practicing certificate withdrawalCuratorshipDisciplinary tribunal referralProcedural fairnessNatural justice
Tags
Legal practitioner regulationPracticing certificateDisciplinary proceedingsCuratorship
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • T
  • o
  • w
  • n
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • y
  • P
  • l
  • a
  • n
  • n
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 0
  • ;
  • P
  • l
  • a
  • n
  • n
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • p
  • u
  • l
  • s
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • P
  • u
  • r
  • c
  • h
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
  • ;
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 1
  • ;
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • ;
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • .
  • 6
  • ;
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • r
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • ,
  • s
  • .
  • 3
  • 1
  • (
  • 3
  • )
  • ;
  • C
  • i
  • v
  • i
  • l
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • ,
  • r
  • .
  • 5
  • 4
  • .
  • 5
  • (
  • 1
  • )
  • ;
  • T
  • r
  • i
  • b
  • u
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • s
  • ,
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • E
  • n
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • c
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
  • ;
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
  • ;
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 2
  • ;
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • U
  • n
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • (
  • W
  • i
  • t
  • h
  • d
  • r
  • a
  • w
  • a
  • l
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 8
  • ;
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 1
  • ;
  • N
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • y
  • ,
  • I
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • g
  • r
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • A
  • s
  • y
  • l
  • u
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2
  • ;
  • L
  • e
  • g
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • ,
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • n
  • i
  • s
  • h
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • O
  • f
  • f
  • e
  • n
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the withdrawal of the 3rd applicant's practicing certificate was lawful and procedurally fair","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Certificate withdrawn without inquiry; no hearing afforded"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the referral of complaints to the Disciplinary Tribunal followed proper procedures","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Referrals made without proper findings; applicant's defence not considered"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the curatorship resolution was valid","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Resolution subsequently rescinded by respondents"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants, legal practitioners practicing as Antonio & Dzvetero Legal Practitioners, challenged the respondents' decisions to place their firm under curatorship, withdraw the 3rd applicant's practicing certificate, and refer various complaints against them to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal. The respondents made concessions regarding the curatorship but opposed the challenge to the practicing certificate withdrawal and disciplinary referrals.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →