{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in classifying the appellant's role and entitlements","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract designation as catering teller; alleged payslip showing shift leader"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator relied on evidence not in the record","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allegation of continued eating on 11 February 2024"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was denied the right to be heard before the appeals officer","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appeal decided on papers without oral hearing"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, employed as a catering teller, was dismissed for consuming food meant for customers. After internal appeals upheld the dismissal, arbitration confirmed the dismissal. The appellant appealed, claiming she was a shift leader entitled to taste food, was denied a hearing, and the arbitrator relied on non-existent evidence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases