transferrelocationback-paygratuityarbitration award
Tags
transfer disputeback-paygratuity
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
–
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
o
r
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
i
s
q
u
o
t
e
d
o
r
r
e
l
i
e
d
u
p
o
n
.
#
#
#
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
_
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an employee who does not tender services at the workplace is entitled to back-pay and benefits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant failed to relocate respondent; respondent did not report to Norton"}
{"issue_text":"Whether gratuity is payable when employment contract has not been terminated","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employment contract still subsisted"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant employer transferred the respondent employee from Marondera to Kent Estate in Norton but failed to relocate him as promised. When the respondent did not report to Norton, the appellant stopped paying wages. An arbitrator awarded back-pay, gratuity and reinstatement. The appellant appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases