{"issue_text":"Whether an arbitral award granted before 22 February 2019 but registered after that date is subject to the 1:1 conversion rate under SI 33/2019","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award granted 19 March 2015, registered 26 June 2019, SI effective 22 February 2019"}
{"issue_text":"Whether registration of an arbitral award creates a new judgment debt or merely enables execution","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award registered for execution purposes only"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The first respondent obtained an arbitral award against the first appellant for US$4.8 million in March 2015. After appeals were dismissed, the award was registered as a court order in June 2019. The appellant paid RTGS$4.8 million plus interest, leading the sheriff to uplift the judicial attachment on the property. The respondent disputed this, arguing payment should be at the inter-bank rate, not 1:1.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases