{"issue_text":"Is it competent for the Disciplinary Authority to convict on evidence which had not been placed before the applicant?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"CCTV evidence discussed but not produced at hearing"}
{"issue_text":"Do the regulations allow the Disciplinary Authority to make its own finding of guilty on a charge on which the applicant was acquitted by the disciplinary committee?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Committee found not guilty, authority found guilty on same charge"}
{"issue_text":"Was it competent for the Disciplinary Authority to impose a penalty without the applicant addressing in mitigation?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant invited to make closing submissions only"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, employed by the respondent, was charged with misconduct and appeared before a disciplinary committee which found him not guilty. The disciplinary authority rejected this recommendation, found the applicant guilty using extraneous evidence not produced at the hearing, and dismissed him without hearing mitigation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases