Augustus Close Holdings (Private) Limited v Taxing Officer and The Farmakas Trust and Antony Antoniou and Paidamoyo Kurunere and Carol Hobbart and John George Sampson and City of Harare and Director of Works
taxation of costscompromise agreementconsentbill of costsreviewRule 72
Tags
taxation of costscompromise agreementconsent judgmentreview application
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules, 2021
High Court Rules, 2021
High Court Rules, 2021
High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a decision for bill of costs reached through consent of parties and endorsed by the taxing officer can be set aside by application for review","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties reached compromise agreement on costs; applicant consented to taxation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought review of a taxing officer's decision to tax a bill of costs in its favour despite no court order granting such costs. The parties had reached a compromise agreement on costs, which the applicant later sought to challenge through review proceedings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases