Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Augustus Close Holdings (Private) Limited v The Taxating Officer and The Farmakas Trust and Antony Antoniou and Paidamoyo Kuruneri and Carol Habbart and John George Sampson and City of Harare and Director of Works

HH 417-24

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
16 September 2024
Citation
HH 417-24
Neutral Citation
[2024] ZWHH 417
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
WAMAMBO J
Full Bench
WAMAMBO J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureTaxation of CostsExecution
Keywords
bill of coststaxing officerwrit of executionconsentwithdrawal of opposition
Tags
taxation of costswrit of executionstay of executionconsent order
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court should grant a stay of execution of the writ of execution","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Bill taxed without court order, separate application challenging taxation pending"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the taxing officer can tax a bill of costs without a court order","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Rule 72(3) of High Court Rules, consent to taxation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought a stay of execution of a writ of execution issued pursuant to a bill of costs taxed by the first respondent. The bill related to costs tendered by the applicant when it withdrew its opposition in case HC4608/23. The applicant argued the taxing officer had no power to tax costs without a court order, while respondents contended there was consent to the taxation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →