Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

BCM (PVT) LTD v ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY

HH 214-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
28 April 2021
Citation
HH 214-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 214
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
ZIYAMBI AJ
Full Bench
ZIYAMBI AJ
Areas of Law
Tax LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
Value Added TaxTax assessmentFair value adjustmentsAdvisory servicesZero-rated supplies
Tags
VATTax assessmentFiscal appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Immigration Act 1971
  • Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • Extradition Act 1989
  • Extradition Act 2003
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  • Criminal Justice Act 1988
  • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
  • Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993
  • Asylum and Immigration Act 1996
  • Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
  • Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006
  • UK Borders Act 2007
  • Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
  • Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009
  • Immigration Act 2014
  • Immigration Act 2016
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether amounts taxed as sundry income for 2011-2013 were fair value adjustments","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Financial statements showed sundry income, appellant claimed fair value adjustments"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether $100,000 subjected to VAT for 2011 was correctly classified as advisory fees","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No documentary evidence of $100,000 in financials"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether $608,191 and $237,568 for 2013 were share income and dividend income","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Amounts not reflected in financial statements under claimed headings"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether $2,447,092 for 2014 was supply to non-resident qualifying for 0% VAT","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Services rendered for Atlas Mara but also benefited BancABC (local entity)"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether $3,321,293 for 2015 was fair value gain","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Issue not included in grounds of appeal"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether 75% penalty was appropriate","issue_type":"discretionary","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No grounds of appeal on penalty"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant, an investment holding company, appealed against VAT assessments issued by ZIMRA for the period 2011-2015. ZIMRA had assessed that various income streams including sundry income and advisory fees should have been subjected to VAT but were not declared. The assessments totaled $3,397,322.26 including a 75% penalty.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →