Beatus Mandeya v Sakunda Logistics

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether people who were not part of the disciplinary committee decided the matter against the applicant","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Deadlock procedure and referral to Chief Executive"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the record of proceedings was incomplete and inaccurate","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Missing evidence from Mr S Gutsa and recusal application"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the charge was vague and embarrassing","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's request for clarification of charge"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the chairperson had prejudged the matter","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Mr Hungwe's letter response to postponement request"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the disciplinary authority erred in finding gross negligence","issue_type":"substantive","dispositive":"no (not reached due to setting aside)","related_facts":"Nexus between actions and fuel loss"}

Background