real estatenegligenceprocedural complianceexception
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
1
9
5
0
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
P
o
w
e
r
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
C
o
u
r
t
s
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
M
u
r
d
e
r
(
A
b
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
a
t
h
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
)
A
c
t
1
9
6
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
1
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
E
n
g
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
W
a
l
e
s
)
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
0
0
P
r
i
s
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Does rule 12(2) require a party raising an exception to file a paginated and indexed bundle?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendants raised exception without filing bundle"}
{"issue_text":"Should the preliminary objection be upheld given mutual non-compliance with rules?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Both parties failed to observe court rules"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Plaintiffs sought compensation for loss from unsuccessful property transaction. First and second defendants raised an exception to the claim. Plaintiffs objected preliminarily that defendants failed to comply with rule 12(2) requiring a paginated and indexed bundle. The court upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the exception for non-compliance with court rules.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases