Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Border Timbers Limited vs Zimbabwe Revenue Authority

HH 102-2005

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
9 November 2005
Citation
HH 102-2005
Neutral Citation
[2005] ZWHH 102
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Opposed Application

Bench

Presiding
Hungwe J
Full Bench
Hungwe J
Areas of Law
Customs and ExciseTax LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
Urea formaldehyde polymerCommodity classificationTariff codeCustoms duty
Tags
Customs classificationTariff disputeUrea resin
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Customs and Excise (Tariff) Notice 2002
  • Customs and Excise (Tariff) Notice 2002
  • Customs and Excise (Tariff) Notice 2002
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether urea resin in powder form should be classified under Commodity Code 39.09 (amino resins in primary form) or Code 35.06 (prepared glues)","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Product composition, manufacturing process, previous classification"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Border Timbers Limited imports urea resin in powder form for use in wood product manufacturing. Zimbabwe Revenue Authority reclassified the urea resin from Commodity Code 39.09 to 35.06, leading to a dispute over the correct tariff classification for customs duty purposes.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →