**for proposition**: instrument made under this Act lapses after 180 days; here used to explain why S.I. 33/2019 expired but was re-enacted in Finance (No. 2) Act 2019.
**Companies Act** [Chapter 24:03] (repealed)
**s 2 & s 329 & s 330** – **considered**
**for proposition**: definitions of “foreign company” and “place of business” used to determine respondent’s residence.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the outstanding debt of USD 31,400.00 was a foreign obligation payable in USD or a local obligation payable in RTGS dollars","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent is UK company, asset is Zambian shares, contract in USD"}
{"issue_text":"Whether S.I. 142/2019 made payment in USD legally impossible","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"S.I. 142/2019 declared Zimbabwe dollar sole legal tender"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant purchased shares from the respondent for USD 46,347.00 in 2016, paid USD 14,947.00, leaving USD 31,400.00 outstanding. After currency reforms in 2019, the appellant argued the balance was payable in RTGS dollars, not USD. The High Court ruled it remained payable in USD. The appellant appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases