Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Brian Kashangura v Gilliet Sarudzai Motsi

HH 150-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
16 March 2022
Citation
HH 150-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 150
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureAppellate Practice
Keywords
Leave to appealRule 263Rule 269Civil proceedingsSupreme Court appeal
Tags
Leave to appealCivil procedureHigh Court Rules
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Act [Chapter 7.06]
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant's application for leave to appeal was properly before the court despite initially citing the wrong rule","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant initially cited Rule 263 but conceded it applies to criminal trials"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against a judgment delivered in HC 1456/20 (HH 743/20). The respondent opposed the application, raising a preliminary point that the applicant had used the wrong procedure by invoking Rule 263 which applies to criminal trials.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →