Terminal benefitsPayment in instalmentsArbitration awardUnfair labour practice
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in not ordering cessation of unfair labour practice or punishment of respondent","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent admitted liability but disputed payment terms"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in ordering terminal benefits paid in three instalments despite being overdue","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Benefits overdue for over a year; respondent's financial difficulties"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in refusing to order respondent to pay legal costs and arbitration fees","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant insisted on independent arbitrator; respondent claimed financial difficulties"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant resigned from employment and claimed $2,727.87 in outstanding salaries and terminal benefits. The parties disagreed on payment terms - appellant wanted lump sum, respondent offered instalments. After conciliation failed, arbitration ordered three monthly instalments. Appellant appealed against both payment terms and cost allocation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases