Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

CBZ Bank Limited v Michael Elia S P Peter Mhundwa

HH 633-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
27 September 2017
Citation
HH 633-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 633
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
CHITAKUNYE J
Full Bench
CHITAKUNYE JNDEWERE J
Areas of Law
Banking LawContract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Bank errorOverdrawn accountInterest rateReversal of entriesBalance of probabilities
Tags
Banking errorOverdraftInterest chargesBanker-customer relationship
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • m
  • p
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 6
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the bank proved on balance of probabilities that it erroneously credited the respondent's account","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Single deposit triplicated, bank's evidence of error, respondent's denial"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the bank was entitled to charge interest at 28% per annum on the overdrawn account","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Account terms signed by respondent, banking practice on overdrafts"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the bank was entitled to debit the respondent's fixed deposit account","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Account opening terms, overdrawn current account"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

CBZ Bank erroneously credited the respondent's account with US$9,000 instead of US$3,000 due to a system error. After discovering the error and reversing the entries, the respondent's account became overdrawn. The bank sued for the overdrawn amount plus interest, while the respondent counter-claimed for US$2,000 debited from his fixed deposit account.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →