Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

CBZ Bank Limited v Moses Tsorai

HH 502-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
5 September 2018
Citation
HH 502-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 502
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
CHAREWA J
Full Bench
CHAREWA J
Areas of Law
Banking LawContract LawProperty Law
Keywords
Loan agreementMortgage bondIn duplum ruleInterest cappingBank chargesOverdraft
Tags
BankingLoan AgreementMortgage BondIn Duplum RuleInterest Calculation
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 1
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • S
  • e
  • r
  • v
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether defendant is liable to plaintiff in the amount claimed of $85,773.69","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Total withdrawals $43,192.89; payments $4,098.10; in duplum rule application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

CBZ Bank Limited sued Moses Tsorai for $85,773.69 arising from multiple loan agreements secured by mortgage bonds. The defendant initially disputed the loans but admitted liability at trial, contesting only the quantum. The court had to determine the correct amount owed considering the in duplum rule.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →