{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator grossly misdirected himself on the facts","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's consideration of exemption and other benefits"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred by referring housing allowance issue back to works council after deadlock","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Parties had reached deadlock at works council before arbitration"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator properly considered matters within his terms of reference","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator considered exemption not referred to him"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant union and respondent employer reached deadlock during 2012 NEC wage negotiations over introduction of housing allowance. After failed conciliation, arbitration was held where the arbitrator declined to compel introduction of housing allowance and referred the matter back to works council. The union appealed this arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases