Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Central African Building Society v Penelope Douglas Stone & 1 Or & 2 Ors

[2021] ZWSC 15

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
16 March 2021
Citation
[2021] ZWSC 15
Judgment No.
SC 15/21
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Gwaunza DCJ
Full Bench
Gwaunza DCJMakoni JAKudya AJA
Areas of Law
Banking lawConstitutional lawAdministrative law
Keywords
Bond notesRTGS accountsNostro accountsExchange control directiveCurrency conversion
Tags
Banking lawForeign currency accountsExchange controlConstitutional challenge
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 1
  • (
  • M
  • a
  • i
  • l
  • F
  • r
  • a
  • u
  • d
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 3
  • (
  • W
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • F
  • r
  • a
  • u
  • d
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 6
  • (
  • H
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • -
  • S
  • e
  • r
  • v
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • F
  • r
  • a
  • u
  • d
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 1
  • (
  • H
  • o
  • b
  • b
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2
  • (
  • T
  • r
  • a
  • v
  • e
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 2
  • (
  • c
  • )
  • (
  • R
  • I
  • C
  • O
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 2
  • (
  • d
  • )
  • (
  • R
  • I
  • C
  • O
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • p
  • i
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • y
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 4
  • (
  • c
  • )
  • (
  • R
  • I
  • C
  • O
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • v
  • a
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 2
  • (
  • A
  • i
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • a
  • b
  • e
  • t
  • t
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • )
  • 1
  • 8
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 3
  • 7
  • 1
  • (
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • p
  • i
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • y
  • )
  • 2
  • 1
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 8
  • 4
  • 1
  • (
  • D
  • r
  • u
  • g
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • f
  • f
  • i
  • c
  • k
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • )
  • 2
  • 1
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 8
  • 4
  • 6
  • (
  • D
  • r
  • u
  • g
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • p
  • i
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • y
  • )
  • 2
  • 1
  • U
  • .
  • S
  • .
  • C
  • .
  • §
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3
  • (
  • D
  • r
  • u
  • g
  • i
  • m
  • p
  • o
  • r
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • p
  • i
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • y
  • )
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in granting main relief on basis not argued","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Court dismissed main claim then granted it after declaring directive unconstitutional"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in setting aside 2018 Directive on constitutional basis not pleaded","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents did not challenge directive's constitutionality"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether court erred ordering USD payment contrary to SI 133/19 and Finance Act provisions","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Directive remained valid and unchallenged"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondents, partners in an architectural firm, held a savings account with CABS with a balance of USD 142,000 as at October 2016. Following the introduction of bond notes and subsequent Exchange Control Directive RT120/2018, their account was converted to an RTGS Foreign Currency Account payable in bond notes rather than USD. The respondents demanded payment in USD and challenged the directive's validity.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →