Central African Road Services (Pvt) Limited versus Commissioner General of Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited
{"issue_text":"Whether the urgent application meets the requirements for interim relief","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Self-created urgency, knowledge since June 2014"}
{"issue_text":"Whether ZIMRA's garnishee actions violate constitutional rights under Section 68","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delay in appointing agent, failure to respond to applicant"}
{"issue_text":"Whether proper notice was given under Section 33 of the Revenue Authority Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alternative procedures under different statutes"}
{"issue_text":"Whether an interdict can be granted for already debited amounts","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Past vs future invasions of rights"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Central African Road Services (Pvt) Limited, a transport company, received revised income tax assessments for 2009-2012 totaling US$490,042.54. After their objection was dismissed and appeal to the Fiscal Appeals Court was pending, ZIMRA issued garnishee orders and froze their bank accounts, debiting $85,180. The company sought interim relief to stop further garnishment and recover already debited amounts.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases