Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Chamunorwa Chingwe v Judicial Service Commission and President of the Republic of Zimbabwe and Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs

HH 319-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
24 June 2021
Citation
HH 319-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 319
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
CHITAPI J
Full Bench
CHITAPI J
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawAdministrative LawJudicial Review
Keywords
judicial appointmentsSupreme CourtConstitutional Courts 180 Constitutionlocus standiurgencyinterdict
Tags
judicial appointmentsconstitutional challengeurgent applicationlocus standi
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 2) Act, 2021
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court can interdict constitutional bodies from exercising their constitutional functions","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application sought to prescribe how JSC should make recommendations"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant is 27 years old, not a judge, acting in own interest"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application is urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"20-day delay between amendment and application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

A 27-year-old Zimbabwean citizen brought an urgent application seeking to interdict the Judicial Service Commission and President from appointing Supreme Court and Constitutional Court judges without following the public interview process in s 180(4) of the Constitution, arguing that both sitting and non-sitting judges should be considered.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →