Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Chiriga Estates (Pvt) Ltd and Milrite Farming (Pvt) Ltd and Silverton Estates (Pvt) Ltd v Minister of Lands and Rural Resettlement and Mr E. Porusingazi and Mr M. I. Kamba and Mr A. Musona and Ms A. Chitima and S. Zuze and The Officer Commanding Z R Police Chipinge and The Officer Commanding Z. R. Police Manicaland Province and The Commissioner-General Z.R. Police and The Attorney-General

HH 34-2010

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
15 February 2010
Citation
HH 34-2010
Neutral Citation
[2010] ZWHH 34
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
MUSAKWA J
Full Bench
MUSAKWA J
Areas of Law
Property LawSpoliationLand Reform
Keywords
spoliation orderGazetted Land (Consequential Provisions) Actunlawful dispossessioneviction
Tags
spoliationland reformevictiongazetted land
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Gazetted Land (Consequential Provisions) Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have established the requirements for a spoliation order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged forcible dispossession, failure to identify perpetrators, hearsay evidence"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the second respondent was properly cited","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Citation by name, ID number and address related to Enos Porusingazi but person attending court claims not to be the perpetrator"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether costs de bonis propiis should be awarded against the legal practitioner","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Mr Drury's conduct in preparing and filing deficient application despite warnings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants, who had been convicted under the Gazetted Land (Consequential Provisions) Act and ordered to vacate the land, sought a spoliation order claiming they were forcibly dispossessed by the respondents. The application was brought on an urgent basis following their conviction and eviction order.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →