{"issue_text":"Whether defendant entered into agreement with plaintiff in October 2008","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged oral agreement, plaintiff's conduct, George Paliouras' authority"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claims are extinguished by prescription","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Agreement provided payment after 2 years from October 2008, summons issued November 2013"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant should produce secretarial files and financial statements","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Plaintiff's alternative claim for production of documents"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff claimed he entered into an oral agreement with the defendant in October 2008 to revive its dormant milling operations, under which he would receive shares and director's remuneration equivalent to George Paliouras. The defendant denied any such agreement and raised prescription. After the plaintiff closed his case, the defendant applied for absolution from the instance.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases