{"issue_text":"Whether property registered in company name should be considered in division of matrimonial assets","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mt Pleasant property registered in Linford Investment (Pvt) Ltd; plaintiff controls company; family lived rent-free"}
{"issue_text":"What constitutes fair and equitable distribution of immovable property between spouses","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Joint ownership of Marlborough house; plaintiff's control of Mt Pleasant property; parties' contributions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 1988 and acquired immovable properties during the marriage. The plaintiff sought divorce citing irretrievable breakdown and requested 50% share in the matrimonial house. The defendant contested and claimed the Marlborough house be donated to children or alternatively he be declared sole owner. The main dispute centered on whether a Mt Pleasant property registered in a company name should be considered matrimonial property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases