prescriptiondebtacknowledgment of liabilitycontract breachimmovable propertydeed of transfer
Tags
prescriptioncontract cancellationimmovable propertybreach of contract
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Civil Evidence Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim for cancellation has prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim arose in 1999, summons issued in 2020"}
{"issue_text":"Whether prescription was interrupted by acknowledgment of liability","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"September 2000 extension request, alleged oral arrangements"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Plaintiff sought cancellation of Deed of Transfer No. 1084/98 for breach of building clause in 1992 sale agreement. First defendant raised prescription defence. Court found claim prescribed as no evidence of interruption through acknowledgment of liability.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases