Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

City of Harare v Evaristo Mungate

SC 86/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
16 October 2018
Citation
SC 86/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 86
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MAKONI JA
Full Bench
GOWORA JAMAKONI JABERE JA
Areas of Law
Delictual LiabilityNegligenceDamages
Keywords
catch pituncovered drainagecontributory negligenceapportionment of damageslocal authority duty of care
Tags
negligencecontributory negligencedamageslocal authority liability
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Damages (Apportionment and Assessment) Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding no contributory negligence by respondent","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent ran in dark area, waved down omnibus at undesignated spot"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether damages should be apportioned under s 4 of Damages (Apportionment and Assessment) Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged negligence by both parties contributed to accident"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in ordering appellant to pay costs","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent made high initial damages claim"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent fell into an uncovered catch pit belonging to the appellant City of Harare on 28 March 2014, sustaining a broken leg and permanent disability. He claimed damages for negligence. The High Court found the City liable and awarded damages. The City appealed, arguing the respondent was contributorily negligent and damages should be apportioned.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →