Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2000
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) Order 2003
Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (Fast Track Procedure) Rules 2005
Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
Civil Procedure Rules 1998
Family Procedure Rules 2010
Criminal Procedure Rules 2010
Supreme Court Rules 2009
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Sheriff exceeded his mandate by attaching property not described in the writ of execution","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The writ described property under Deed 1110/59 but property under Deed 7485/87 was attached"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in piercing the corporate veil between City of Harare and Rufaro Marketing (Pvt) Ltd","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"City of Harare is shareholder in Rufaro Marketing; entities have separate boards"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The City of Harare appealed against a High Court decision that dismissed its claim in interpleader proceedings. The Sheriff had attached property belonging to the City of Harare instead of property of the judgment debtor Rufaro Marketing (Pvt) Ltd, based on an incorrect belief that the entities were one and the same.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases