DismissalArbitral awardCode of conductRetrospective applicationRe-employment
Tags
Disciplinary proceedingsCode of conductRetrospective application
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
P
r
i
s
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
5
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
6
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
L
e
g
a
l
A
i
d
,
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
1
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
P
r
i
s
o
n
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
B
i
l
l
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
2
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
3
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
4
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
5
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
6
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
7
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
8
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
9
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
0
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
1
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
2
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
3
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
4
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
5
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
6
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
7
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
8
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
9
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
2
0
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
1
6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the 26 May 2010 letter constituted a new contract of employment","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Letter dated 26 May 2010 calling for resumption of duty"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the delay in instituting disciplinary proceedings amounted to waiver of rights","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Disciplinary proceedings conducted in 2010 for misconduct in 2009"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the wrong Code of Conduct was applied in the disciplinary proceedings","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"S I 171 of 2010 applied instead of S I 17 of 2007"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was dismissed by the appellant employer for absenteeism from 1 February 2009 to 16 October 2009. The dismissal was set aside by an arbitrator who found the appellant had waived its rights and that a 2010 letter constituted re-employment. The appellant appealed, arguing the arbitrator erred on these findings and that the wrong disciplinary code was applied.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases