{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in law by finding that lateral transfer was unlawful when done without affording employees opportunity to make representations","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employees not consulted before transfer decision"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator properly ordered reinstatement without first setting aside guilty verdict","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator substituted penalty without quashing proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Six municipal employees were dismissed for refusing to accept lateral transfer letters after being directed to move to new work stations without prior consultation. The employees argued that the transfers violated section 28(7) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement requiring opportunity to make representations before transfer.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases