Right to waterWater disconnectionStatutory bodyContractual breach
Tags
Water supplyConstitutional rightsContractual disputesLocal authority
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Justice Act 2003
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights Act 1998
Prison Act 1952
Prison Rules 1999 (SI 1999/728)
Crime (Sentences) Act 1997
Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000
Offender Management Act 2007
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
Coroners and Justice Act 2009
Constitutional Reform Act 2005
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant's claim is res judicata","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Previous urgent application HC 2611/14"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant exhausted domestic remedies","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Available remedies under ZINWA Act"}
{"issue_text":"Whether water agreement permitting supply reduction is unconstitutional","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Section 77 constitutional right to water, agreement clauses 16 and 25"}
{"issue_text":"Whether water agreement is ultra vires the enabling Act","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"ZINWA Act sections 5, 18 and 30"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The City of Kwekwe sought a declaratory order against Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA) challenging the lawfulness of ZINWA's reduction of water supply to 20% due to non-payment of water bills totaling US$1,576,693.24. The applicant argued this violated constitutional rights to water and was unlawful.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases