{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant's refusal to obey the lawful order to work as a till operator was justified","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Doctor's medical recommendation; appellant's observed ability to sit for long periods; CCTV footage showing appellant performing duties"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a valid Final Written Warning existed at the time of dismissal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's assertion that no prior disciplinary proceedings were held"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the employer should have granted sick leave under Section 14 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's illness; doctor's recommendation; appellant's awareness of her rights"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, employed by OK Zimbabwe Limited, was dismissed for refusing to obey a lawful order to work as a till operator despite her doctor's recommendation that she needed work that did not require sitting all the time. She refused to consult the company doctor and declined to allow CCTV footage to be viewed during disciplinary proceedings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases