Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Clarkpayne Investments (Pvt) Ltd v Tanaka Power (Pvt) Ltd

HH 834-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
24 May 2018
Citation
HH 834-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 834
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Zhou J
Full Bench
Zhou J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
summary judgmentejectmentimmovable propertydeed of transferownershipsale in execution
Tags
summary judgmentejectmentproperty ownershipdeed of transfer
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether summary judgment should be granted for ejectment","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant holds valid deed of transfer; respondent claims ownership without basis"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent has established a bona fide defence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent claims ownership but has no deed; deed shows applicant as owner"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, as registered owner of immovable property acquired through a sale in execution, sought ejectment of the respondent who occupied the property without consent. The respondent opposed the summary judgment application claiming to be the rightful owner despite the applicant holding a valid deed of transfer.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →