unfair labour practicearbitral awardprescriptioncontractual benefitscompany carfuel allowance
Tags
pension fundcontractual benefitsprescriptionarbitration award
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent's claim for company car and fuel allowance had prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant accepted award in 2009, reneged later, raised prescription defence"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The second respondent, employed since 1982, complained of unfair labour practices including withdrawal of contractual benefits. An arbitrator ruled in his favour in 2009, ordering reinstatement of benefits including a company car and fuel allowance. The appellant accepted the award but later reneged on providing the car and fuel. When the respondent complained again, the appellant raised prescription as a defence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases